When to Choose 4G NB-IoT Over LoRaWAN for Your IoT Projects
- tass peters
- Jan 6
- 4 min read
The Internet of Things (IoT) landscape offers many wireless connectivity options, each with strengths and weaknesses. Two popular choices are 4G NB-IoT (Narrowband IoT) and LoRaWAN (Long Range Wide Area Network). Deciding which technology fits your project can be challenging. This post explains when 4G NB-IoT is the better option over LoRaWAN, helping you make an informed choice based on your project’s needs.
Understanding 4G NB-IoT and LoRaWAN
Before choosing between these two, it helps to understand their core differences.
4G NB-IoT is a cellular technology designed for IoT devices. It operates on licensed spectrum bands, offering reliable coverage and secure connections. It supports deep indoor penetration and can handle a large number of devices per cell.
LoRaWAN is a low-power, wide-area network technology that uses unlicensed spectrum. It excels in long-range communication with very low power consumption, making it ideal for battery-powered sensors in rural or remote areas.
Both technologies serve different use cases, but their features sometimes overlap. Knowing when to pick 4G NB-IoT over LoRaWAN depends on factors like coverage, data needs, power consumption, and deployment environment.
When Coverage and Reliability Matter Most
4G NB-IoT uses existing cellular networks, which means it benefits from the extensive infrastructure of mobile operators. This provides:
Wider and more consistent coverage, especially in urban areas and indoors.
Better network reliability due to licensed spectrum and operator-managed quality of service.
Stronger security with cellular-grade encryption and authentication.
If your IoT project requires devices to work reliably inside buildings, underground, or in dense urban environments, 4G NB-IoT often outperforms LoRaWAN. For example, smart metering in apartment complexes or asset tracking inside warehouses benefits from NB-IoT’s stable connection.
By contrast, LoRaWAN coverage depends on gateway placement and can be spotty indoors or in dense urban settings. It may require deploying multiple gateways to ensure reliable communication.
When You Need Higher Data Rates and More Frequent Communication
LoRaWAN is designed for low data rates and infrequent transmissions, typically sending small packets every few minutes or hours. It suits applications like environmental monitoring or simple status updates.
4G NB-IoT supports higher data rates and can handle more frequent communication. This makes it suitable for:
Real-time monitoring where data updates happen every few seconds or minutes.
Firmware updates over the air that require larger data transfers.
Applications needing acknowledgments or two-way communication with low latency.
For example, a smart parking system that updates spot availability in real time or a connected vending machine reporting inventory levels frequently would benefit from NB-IoT’s capabilities.
When Power Consumption and Battery Life Are Critical
LoRaWAN is known for its ultra-low power consumption, enabling devices to run on batteries for years without replacement. This makes it ideal for remote sensors in agriculture or environmental monitoring where changing batteries is difficult.
4G NB-IoT devices consume more power than LoRaWAN but still offer good battery life, often lasting several years depending on usage patterns. NB-IoT achieves this through power-saving modes and efficient communication protocols.
If your project involves devices with access to power or where battery replacement is manageable, NB-IoT’s higher power use may be acceptable in exchange for better coverage and data rates.
When You Want Easy Deployment and Scalability
Using 4G NB-IoT means leveraging existing cellular networks, which reduces the need to install and maintain your own gateways. This can speed up deployment and reduce upfront costs.
LoRaWAN requires setting up gateways to cover your area, which can be costly and complex, especially in large or urban environments. However, LoRaWAN networks can be private or public, giving flexibility in control and data ownership.
If your project needs to scale quickly across multiple locations or countries, NB-IoT’s global cellular infrastructure simplifies expansion. For example, a logistics company tracking assets across cities benefits from NB-IoT’s wide availability.
When Cost Considerations Influence Your Choice
LoRaWAN devices and gateways tend to be cheaper upfront, and operating on unlicensed spectrum means no ongoing network fees. This makes LoRaWAN attractive for budget-conscious projects.
4G NB-IoT devices may cost more, and cellular connectivity usually involves subscription fees. However, these costs can be offset by reduced infrastructure needs and improved reliability.
For projects with tight budgets and simple data needs, LoRaWAN is often the better choice. For projects where uptime and data quality are critical, investing in NB-IoT pays off.
Summary of When to Use 4G NB-IoT Instead of LoRaWAN
| Factor | Choose 4G NB-IoT | Choose LoRaWAN |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Coverage | Urban, indoor, underground, wide area | Rural, open areas, limited gateway setup|
| Data Rate | Higher, frequent updates | Low, infrequent small packets |
| Power Consumption | Moderate, several years battery life | Ultra-low, multi-year battery life |
| Deployment | Fast, uses existing cellular networks | Requires gateway installation |
| Scalability | Easy across regions with cellular coverage| Flexible private/public network options |
| Cost | Higher device and subscription costs | Lower upfront and operating costs |
Choosing 4G NB-IoT makes sense when your IoT project demands reliable coverage, higher data throughput, and easier scaling. LoRaWAN fits better when power efficiency and low cost are top priorities, especially in remote or rural settings.
Comments